<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for CyrusBuilt dot Net</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cyrusbuilt.net/wordpress/?feed=comments-rss2" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cyrusbuilt.net/wordpress</link>
	<description>A place for geeks  ;-)</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 26 Oct 2009 18:53:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on Outlook Anywhere via GPO/Logon Script by bn1cholson</title>
		<link>http://cyrusbuilt.net/wordpress/?p=150&#038;cpage=1#comment-5</link>
		<dc:creator>bn1cholson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Oct 2009 18:53:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cyrusbuilt.net/wordpress/?p=150#comment-5</guid>
		<description>I believe you can do this with a properly-constructed PRF file without creating a profile first. The PRF does support RPC over HTTP (a.k.a., Outlook Anywhere) settings. We do this so that we don&#039;t have to manually create anyone&#039;s mailbox as long as they&#039;re on a domain PC.

About the PRF file: 
http://office.microsoft.com/en-us/ork2003/HA011402581033.aspx

Create a custom .adm template, and use it in the User Configuration portion of a GPO. Store your PRF in a shared location, and use this policy to point Outlook to that PRF file. The policy below is the custom .adm template, configured for both Outlook 11 and Outlook 12. I don&#039;t remember where I got this.

Start of custom adm template ------------------------------- 
CLASS USER

CATEGORY !!TopCategory
KEYNAME &quot;Software\Microsoft\Office\11.0\Outlook\Setup&quot;
POLICY !!PolicyName
EXPLAIN !!PolicyHelp
PART !!PRFLocation EDITTEXT EXPANDABLETEXT REQUIRED
DEFAULT !!DefaultLocation
VALUENAME &quot;ImportPRF&quot;
END PART
END POLICY
END CATEGORY ;TopCategory

CATEGORY !!TopCategory12
KEYNAME &quot;Software\Microsoft\Office\12.0\Outlook\Setup&quot;
POLICY !!PolicyName12
EXPLAIN !!PolicyHelp12
PART !!PRFLocation12 EDITTEXT EXPANDABLETEXT REQUIRED
DEFAULT !!DefaultLocation12
VALUENAME &quot;ImportPRF&quot;
END PART
END POLICY
END CATEGORY ;TopCategory12

[strings]
TopCategory=&quot;Outlook 2003 Profile&quot;
PolicyName=&quot;PRF Import&quot;
PolicyHelp=&quot;&quot;
PRFLocation=&quot;Full path to the PRF file to import.&quot;
DefaultLocation=&quot;&quot;
TopCategory12=&quot;Outlook 2007 Profile&quot;
PolicyName12=&quot;PRF Import&quot;
PolicyHelp12=&quot;&quot;
PRFLocation12=&quot;Full path to the PRF file to import.&quot;
DefaultLocation12=&quot;&quot;
End of custom adm template ---------------------------------</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I believe you can do this with a properly-constructed PRF file without creating a profile first. The PRF does support RPC over HTTP (a.k.a., Outlook Anywhere) settings. We do this so that we don&#8217;t have to manually create anyone&#8217;s mailbox as long as they&#8217;re on a domain PC.</p>
<p>About the PRF file:<br />
<a href="http://office.microsoft.com/en-us/ork2003/HA011402581033.aspx" rel="nofollow">http://office.microsoft.com/en-us/ork2003/HA011402581033.aspx</a></p>
<p>Create a custom .adm template, and use it in the User Configuration portion of a GPO. Store your PRF in a shared location, and use this policy to point Outlook to that PRF file. The policy below is the custom .adm template, configured for both Outlook 11 and Outlook 12. I don&#8217;t remember where I got this.</p>
<p>Start of custom adm template &#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;-<br />
CLASS USER</p>
<p>CATEGORY !!TopCategory<br />
KEYNAME &#8220;Software\Microsoft\Office\11.0\Outlook\Setup&#8221;<br />
POLICY !!PolicyName<br />
EXPLAIN !!PolicyHelp<br />
PART !!PRFLocation EDITTEXT EXPANDABLETEXT REQUIRED<br />
DEFAULT !!DefaultLocation<br />
VALUENAME &#8220;ImportPRF&#8221;<br />
END PART<br />
END POLICY<br />
END CATEGORY ;TopCategory</p>
<p>CATEGORY !!TopCategory12<br />
KEYNAME &#8220;Software\Microsoft\Office\12.0\Outlook\Setup&#8221;<br />
POLICY !!PolicyName12<br />
EXPLAIN !!PolicyHelp12<br />
PART !!PRFLocation12 EDITTEXT EXPANDABLETEXT REQUIRED<br />
DEFAULT !!DefaultLocation12<br />
VALUENAME &#8220;ImportPRF&#8221;<br />
END PART<br />
END POLICY<br />
END CATEGORY ;TopCategory12</p>
<p>[strings]<br />
TopCategory=&#8221;Outlook 2003 Profile&#8221;<br />
PolicyName=&#8221;PRF Import&#8221;<br />
PolicyHelp=&#8221;"<br />
PRFLocation=&#8221;Full path to the PRF file to import.&#8221;<br />
DefaultLocation=&#8221;"<br />
TopCategory12=&#8221;Outlook 2007 Profile&#8221;<br />
PolicyName12=&#8221;PRF Import&#8221;<br />
PolicyHelp12=&#8221;"<br />
PRFLocation12=&#8221;Full path to the PRF file to import.&#8221;<br />
DefaultLocation12=&#8221;"<br />
End of custom adm template &#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on WMI Scripting with AutoIt by admin</title>
		<link>http://cyrusbuilt.net/wordpress/?p=79&#038;cpage=1#comment-3</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Feb 2009 00:45:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cyrusbuilt.net/wordpress/?p=79#comment-3</guid>
		<description>Well.... that was one of the things I&#039;d hoped to extrapolate from this type of query.  I looked into querying the Win32_BIOS class, but judging by the MSDN documentation, it doesn&#039;t look like you can get the chipset from it.  I&#039;m thinking this could probably be accomplished by querying the Win32_SystemDevices class.... though I haven&#039;t figured out exactly how yet.  For us, getting the &quot;Model&quot; property from the Win32_ComputerSystem class has been sufficient because we use mostly Intel and SuperMicro motherboards.  The &quot;Model&quot; property for these boards typically returns a valid model that we can then look up and get the specs on.  In the case of Intel, the chipset typically makes up part of the model name, like &quot;D946GZ&quot; for example.  In this case &quot;D946GZ&quot; tells me that it&#039;s a desktop-class board and uses the Intel 946-series chipset.

Most of the time this is all the information I need, but I&#039;m quite sure there is a more accurate approach.  I just haven&#039;t found it yet.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well&#8230;. that was one of the things I&#8217;d hoped to extrapolate from this type of query.  I looked into querying the Win32_BIOS class, but judging by the MSDN documentation, it doesn&#8217;t look like you can get the chipset from it.  I&#8217;m thinking this could probably be accomplished by querying the Win32_SystemDevices class&#8230;. though I haven&#8217;t figured out exactly how yet.  For us, getting the &#8220;Model&#8221; property from the Win32_ComputerSystem class has been sufficient because we use mostly Intel and SuperMicro motherboards.  The &#8220;Model&#8221; property for these boards typically returns a valid model that we can then look up and get the specs on.  In the case of Intel, the chipset typically makes up part of the model name, like &#8220;D946GZ&#8221; for example.  In this case &#8220;D946GZ&#8221; tells me that it&#8217;s a desktop-class board and uses the Intel 946-series chipset.</p>
<p>Most of the time this is all the information I need, but I&#8217;m quite sure there is a more accurate approach.  I just haven&#8217;t found it yet.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on WMI Scripting with AutoIt by PeterZoll</title>
		<link>http://cyrusbuilt.net/wordpress/?p=79&#038;cpage=1#comment-2</link>
		<dc:creator>PeterZoll</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Feb 2009 16:12:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cyrusbuilt.net/wordpress/?p=79#comment-2</guid>
		<description>We did much the same thing - we did find that a number of older machines running XP had null values in one or more fields. What we did not find was a field with a chipset name
like X38, G41, 955X ... - the names that Intel uses. We looked through most of WMI - if seems if the chipset name is not in ComputerSystem or its child it must be well hidden. Did you have any better luck with chipset names on your computers?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We did much the same thing &#8211; we did find that a number of older machines running XP had null values in one or more fields. What we did not find was a field with a chipset name<br />
like X38, G41, 955X &#8230; &#8211; the names that Intel uses. We looked through most of WMI &#8211; if seems if the chipset name is not in ComputerSystem or its child it must be well hidden. Did you have any better luck with chipset names on your computers?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
